David Carbone |
JOHN GRAHAM’S APOSTASY: FOR AND AGAINST PICASSO |
One summer’s day, during MoMA’s great Picasso retrospective, I found
myself standing before a large major canvas depicting a still life set
before a window, The Bird Cage of 1923. I was fascinated by the use of
flat, brilliant yellow shapes, suggesting the light flooding in from the
window, and playing over the whole field of the picture’s surface while
holding distinctly different positions in the space of the room. As I continued
to bathe in the pulsing energy of the work, I became aware that
the bird wasn’t the only trapped figure. Shape-shifting within the forms
of the table and its objects, like the bird who trills in its cage, is a harlequin
singing and playing the guitar.
My absorption in the work’s visual dynamics was broken by the unmistakably
loving tones of a girlish voice, giddy with enthusiasm, “Isn’t he
thrilling?” I turned to see an animated eighty year old woman, who turned
out to be the sculptor Dorothy Dehner. A conversation ensued in which she
told me how she and her former husband, David Smith, had been introduced
to African and Modern art, and especially Picasso, by John Graham.
Listening to her I felt as though I had met an early Christian: Picasso was
the Christ and Graham was his prophet.
An aristocratic White Russian, Graham was a charismatic bohemian
presence in the New York art world of the twenties, thirties and forties.
Graham mentored and was friends with Stuart Davis, Arshile Gorky,
Willem de Kooning, and David Smith; after his annual trips to Paris, he
kept them abreast of the latest developments in European Modernism.
Graham was more a connoisseur than an active painter: he amassed a large
and exceptional collection of African and Oceanic Art for Frank
Crowninshield, then the editor of Vanity Fair. During the thirties he painted
in a synthetic cubist style. In 1937, Graham published a book on his
Modernist point of view, System and Dialectics of Art, in question and
answer form. Today, the book is seen as a bible of American avant-garde
thought of the time. Also published that year, in April, was an article in the
Magazine of Art, titled Primitive Art and Picasso.
Once, in conversation, Robert Motherwell told me that Pollock was
obsessed with this article, and carried it around to re-read, when they first
met. It apparently was Pollock’s introduction to Picasso, Jung and other
themes central to his development. Later that summer, Graham met Pollock,
and became the first to recognize and promote Pollock’s work. Reading the
essay today, one may easily comprehend the references to the unconscious,
Jungian theory and spontaneous creation, but what can one make of the
eccentric and wildly original opening: “Plastically and aesthetically there are only two basic traditions operating up to our own day: the Greco-African and
the Perso-Indo-Chinese?”
—
DAVID CARBONE is a painter and writer living in New York City. He has
exhibited widely, including The Boston Museum, The Aldrich Museum of
Contemporary Art, The Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston, The National
Academy of Design, and Phyllis Kind Gallery, Chicago. In addition to various
scholarships, fellowships and awards Carbone has been a recipient of The
Englhard Foundation Award and The Ingram-Merrill Award. He has published
criticism and essays on painters in Antaeus, Arts Magazine, Art and Antiques, and
Modern Painters.
For the complete article purchase The
Sienese Shredder #3
Related article in The Sienese Shredder #3
John Graham - The Case of Mr. Picasso
Also by David Carbone
On Seeing Nadelman's Standing Male Nude
Tracing Giovanni’s Shadow
Back to The Sienese Shredder #3
|